>> We know that monopolies raise prices and reduce output relative to the perfectly competitive situation. But there is a way for monopolies to earn even more money while actually moving the market closer to the optimal output. The idea is that monopolies are able to charge different people different prices. First, let's talk about why monopolies are the only kind of companies that can do this. Suppose you had two burger places right next to each other. What if Barb's Burgers decided to charge everyone $8 for a burger while Bob's Burgers charged $6 to students and seniors and $10 to everybody else? Well everyone who is not a senior or a student would switch from Bob's to Barb's and Bob would lose money. So this really only works when there is one producer and the product can't be the kind of thing that can be resold. Otherwise you'd have seniors loading up on cheap goods and reselling them to everybody else. So this only works for experiences or services like movies or airline tickets or ski tickets. But why would a monopoly want to charge different people different prices anyway? Suppose Slush Mountain is the only ski resort in the region. It knows that there are two kinds of consumers; high income professional families whose kids will pester them to go skiing, and teenagers. Suppose Slush Mountain charges everyone a low price. Both the teenagers and the families will ski but it could have gotten much more money out of the high income families. On the other hand if it charges a high price, it will make money off of the families but now the teenagers can't afford to ski, reducing the number of consumers. Slush Mountain can make the most money by charging a high price to the families who have the ability and the willingness to pay it, and then charging a lower price to the teenagers with a student discount. They get high revenue off of the families and high volume from the teenagers. Now here's the strange part; the closer the monopolist comes to charging each individual person the highest price they'd be willing to pay, the closer we get to the efficient output quantity. Remember without price discrimination, monopolies charge a higher price and produce a smaller quantity than the competitive market would with the same demand and production costs. Price discrimination allows the monopoly to expand its number of consumers without losing money on the people who are willing to pay a lot. Society is better off overall because we're back to producing all the goods where the benefit to consumers exceeds the cost to producers. But the monopolist captures all of those societal benefits by charging each set of customers a price equal to their entire benefit.