When does a unprofitable firm shut down? Like many questions in economics the answer is it depends. Let's go back to our firm cost graph. Remember, we've got costs and revenues in dollars per unit on the vertical axis, and the firm's output on the horizontal. We've seen that sometimes the market price can drop below the break-even point for a firm. This causes the firm to lose money on every item it produces. First we need to make a distinction between the short-run and the long-run. In the short-run the firm can change its variable costs; raw materials, inputs, and wages by changing its level of output but it can't change its fixed costs like capital, advertising, or research. In the long-run the firm is free to change both variable and fixed costs. The firm's choice in the long-run is clear, if the market price is below the break-even and is expected to stay there; the firm will always shut down in the long-run and can even exit the industry. Unless it has a dollar printing press in its basement no firm can keep spending more than it's making year after year. In the short-run, however, the firm has a choice to make. When the market price is so low that the firm is making losses, the firm is faced with two bad options and it needs to pick the one that is less bad. The first bad option is to keep producing at a loss in the short-run even though you know you'll exit in the long-run. As always the firm picks the output where marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue. The per unit loss is the difference between the average total cost and the price and the total loss is that per unit loss times the number of units. The firm picks this quantity because any other quantity would actually give it a much worse loss. The second option is to shut down immediately in the short-run. Output goes to zero which means revenue goes to zero and variable costs go to zero. However, by definition in the short-run the firm is still stuck with paying its fixed cost. So the loss in this case is equal to the fixed cost. The firm will choose whichever path results in a smaller loss and that actually depends on the often-overlooked average variable cost. We know that when price equals minimum average total cost, the firm is just breaking even. At a higher price it's making profits and at a lower price it's making losses. For deep mathematical reasons that we won't explore here it turns out that minimum average variable cost is the break point between producing for a loss in the short-run and shutting down in the short-run. At prices between minimum ATC and minimum AVC the loss incurred by producing is smaller than the fixed cost. So rather than shutting down and trying to pay your fixed cost without any revenue, it's better to produce at that smaller loss. At prices below minimum AVC the loss from production actually grows larger than the fixed cost. So it's actually better to shut down on the short-run and pay the fixed costs you are stuck with even without any revenue. Remember that the firm's marginal cost curve is really its supply curve. Tell it a price and the marginal cost tells them how much to produce to maximize profits or minimize losses. Our shutdown rule breaks the marginal cost curve into three parts. At prices above minimum ATC, you're making profits so go ahead and produce. At prices between minimum ATC and minimum AVC you'll keep producing at a loss in the short-run but shutdown in the long-run when you can get out from under your fixed costs. And at prices below minimum AVC you want to shut down immediately in the short-run. That's why some textbooks will show the firm's supply curve like this. Production will always be zero at prices below the minimum AVC.